There's been a hunger strike a GITMO for the past 49 days. Have you heard about it? Of Course not.
Why are they in a hunger strike? What difference does it make how they die? They have no rights; They have no one to defend their rights; They're not POWs; They're not criminals. Even when found innocent by a US military tribunal they remain held.
It's a coincidence I'm sure that while the US claims to support the Geneva Accords for prisoner treatment Bush has adamantly vowed to veto any bill that would guarantee humane treatment or at least treatment under Geneva Accord for POWS. (Weird too is he's never used his veto power for any spending bill put before him. But that might be why our federal deficit is $500 Billion annually. But by god no one's going to make him treat someone humanely. ...)
Suicides at GITMO reportedly dropped; But then it was discovered that the term "suicide" was removed from AARs (After Action Reports) for the victims and replaced with Manipulative Self-Injurious Behavior (SIB)--and there were still plenty of SIBs. The military was lying by semantics.
While Rumsfled claims the prisoners are being treated humanely and within the terms of the Geneva Convention....the prisoners are on the 49th day of a hunger strike.
After prisoners tore the feed tubes out of their arms the military used nose tubes. And they assure everyone that no one's going to die from hunger. Sounds a bit coercive? Think arm restraints and sedatives....
What's happened to our country in the past 5 years? Using a presidential veto to block any attempt to insure prisoners are treated humanely and under Geneva Accords...while at the same time never using that to block billions of no-bid contracts.